Jean-Pierre Tarroux
Court-appointed Expert & Communication Expert
“I swear to make contribution to the Justice, accomplish my mission, make my report and give my opinion upon my honour and conscience.”
Oath taken before the Court of Appeal of Paris, November 2006
Jean-Pierre Tarroux
Court-appointed Expert & Communication Expert
“I swear to make contribution to the Justice, accomplish my mission, make my report and give my opinion upon my honour and conscience.”
Oath taken before the Court of Appeal of Paris, November 2006
Court-appointed Expert
Court-appointed Expert at the Court of Appeal of Paris (speciality B-04.06 Advertising) since November 2006; renders advice to the Commercial Courts and to companies, public and professional organizations, and their lawyers.
Member of two Court-appointed Experts Associations:
- The National Court-appointed Experts Association for Culture, Communication and Digital consists of about 30 experts characterised by a variety of professional experiences and specialities such as communication, performing arts, TV, cinema, copyrights…and the digital aspects thereof.
- The European Expertise & Expert Institute (EEEI) aims to contribute to the convergence on core principles of the EU’s national systems of judicial expertise. The EEEI is also a cross-professional, cross-border platform for debate and is independent of all public authorities.
Communication Expert
The official nomenclature classifies the Court-appointed Expert – speciality B-04.06 Advertising. Therefore, it limits the presentation of its competences, particularly in the communication field which has strongly evolved with the arrival of the internet, digital, data, social networks, and artificial intelligence.
The Court-appointed Expert, as a professional practitioner, has to specify the full extent of his competences, which are called “fine specialities” in the expertise world and “key words” in the communication one.
Alongside its Court-appointed Expert activity, Jean-Pierre Tarroux is still active as a communication professional. Since 2006, he runs Marque & Management, a consulting company specialized in business and brand strategies.
Why call upon a Court-appointed Expert and Communication Expert?
Strategies, creations, and media plans analysis: TV, radio, press, outdoor advertising, cinema.
Content and digital campaigns audit: site, social networks, data, e-commerce.
Impact of new technologies on communication: AI, connected devices, chatbot.
Quality assessment of a service in comparison to the contract specifications.
Analysis and counter analysis of a technical note, a marketing study or a survey.
Value estimation of a communication campaign.
Estimation of a technical prejudice and its financial implications.
Reality assessment of a brand, packaging and / or communication parasitism.
Identification and analysis of an unfair competition case.
Expertise or Technical Expert Advice
Regardless of the few differences in the practice of expertise and technical expert advice, the ethics of the Court-appointed Expert must remain the same.
Expertise or Technical Expert Advice
Regardless of the few differences in the practice of expertise and technical expert advice, the ethics of the Court-appointed Expert must remain the same.
Expertise
The expertise is done upon request from a judge who needs a technical help on a specific situation. The properly qualified Court-appointed Expert is chosen from a Court-appointed Experts list. The Court-appointed Expert only intervenes on the technical aspects and not on law matters. He meets the parties concerned by a litigation and their lawyers, he hears them on the technical aspects of the matter and gather their statements as well as documents. After several technical meetings, notes and discussions with lawyers, the Court-appointed Expert produces a final report that will be given to the judge.
Technical Expert Advice
The technical expert advice is done upon request of a lawyer, a firm, or a professional / public organization. It is produced in the context of a litigation but, unlike the expertise, it is done upon request of a party. However, it requires from the Court-appointed Expert the same technical rigour and integrity than in the context of an expertise. The technical expert advice may be used in Court and can be contested by the adverse party. The judge can decide whether he takes it into account or not.
Publications and Conferences
The Expertise world faced with the digital and artificial intelligence challenges.
Co-written article with Maître Emmanuel Pierrat. Revue Experts n°137- April 2018.
Digital and artificial intelligence have in common to use algorithm or database, as well as fall under those technological revolutions that transform economic and social life and represent new challenges for the legal world. Court-appointed Experts, who are technicians at the service of the judge, need to become more properly qualified when it comes to digital and artificial intelligence in order to apply it in their field of competence, and also be able to welcome Court-appointed Experts specialized in those fields.
Conference “Expertise & Artificial Intelligence”, Court of Cassation.
Article written following Jean-Pierre Tarroux’s intervention during the conference organized by the Court of Cassation appointed Experts Association (CEACC) on the 26th of November of 2018 which focuses on Expertise & Artificial Intelligence.
Faced with new technologies, let us try to define and think about our future, rather than wonder at its consequences. Anticipate and act because as Günther Anders says in his book named The Obsolescence of Humankind written in 1956 “Inventions are never just technical inventions”. Let us build together the augmented intelligence of Court-appointed Expertise in the service of the law.
The expertise’s transparency, a necessary (r)evolution!
Upcoming article.
In a societal context which claims more equity and clarity, it is important to question ourselves about the role of transparency in the expertise world. Indeed, the latter can be characterized by some weaknesses, conservatisms, and opacity. Yet can the expertise continue to skip its necessary (r)evolution and how can transparency help it redefine itself?
Academic and professional background
Degree in Political Sciences and master’s degree in Economic Sciences, at the Aix-Marseille University.
Combination of two professional cultures: consultant for leading communication agencies and general manager of media agencies.
Founder and manager of Marque & Management, a consulting company specialized in business and brand strategies.
The Court-appointed Expert follows and investigation method that had proved successful. Regardless of the context, the Court-appointed Experts commits to respect the Contradictory principle, seek the Truth, and proceed with Rigour and Precision.
Jean-Pierre Tarroux
COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT & COMMUNICATION EXPERT
The Court-appointed Expert follows and investigation method that had proved successful. Regardless of the context, the Court-appointed Experts commits to respect the Contradictory principle, seek the Truth, and proceed with Rigour and Precision.
Jean-Pierre Tarroux
COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT & COMMUNICATION EXPERT
Contact detail
- Address 29 Boulevard Lannes, 75116 Paris
- Phone+33 6 08 42 63 38
- Emailjptarrouxexpert@gmail.com